Your Superannuation may well become your principal asset. For those in SMSF your Trust Deeds control the powers that can be exercised by your private Fund.
Your Superannuation may well become your principal asset. Retail Funds or Self-Managed Super Funds – SMSF – provide great advantages over ordinary savings in your retirement. There are however traps for those not taking advice or paying attention to the serious requirements of the ATO and ASIC placed upon both styles of funds.
The SMSF Trust Deeds control the powers that can be exercised by your private Fund. They require careful drafting and regular review.
A well drafted effective BDN is one of the most important tools in any effective estate plan. A badly drafted BDBN or allowing the BDBN to lapse can have disastrous unintended consequences.
A BDBN is a notice given by a super fund member to the trustee of their super fund requiring a death benefit to be paid to the member’s nominated dependant(s) and/or legal personal representative.
Without a valid BDBN in place, the super fund trustee will, for better or worse, determine which one or more of the member’s dependants and/or legal personal representative receive the death benefit. can have disastrous unintended consequences.
There are legislative restraints upon those who can take advantage of various tax incentives of BDBNs.
A deceased member’s death benefits can generally only be paid to one or more of their dependants and/or their legal personal representative. Hence, the only people who can be nominated in a BDBN are one or more of their dependants and/or their legal personal representative.
A person’s dependants include their spouse, any child, any person with whom they have an interdependency relationship and any person who is financially dependent on them. Spouse includes same-sex de facto spouse and child includes adopted child, step child, ex-nuptial child and child of the person’s spouse. Two persons have an interdependency relationship if they have a close personal relationship and either:
They live together and one or each of them provides the other with financial and domestic support and personal care; or They do not satisfy the other requirements of an interdependency relationship because either or both of them suffer from a physical, intellectual or psychiatric disability or they are temporarily living apart, e.g. because one of them is temporarily living overseas.
Many pro-forma BDBNs offer members the opportunity to do no more than nominate one or more of their dependants and/or their legal personal representative and the proportion of the death benefit that will be paid to each of those persons, whereas in our opinion, they can do so much more. A more sophisticated BDBN can, for example:
Identify specific assets to be paid to particular beneficiaries;
Specify the manner in which the benefit will be paid, e.g. a lump sum (cash or in specie) or pension; and/or
Include alternative beneficiaries in case one of the primary beneficiaries pre-deceases the BDBN-holder.
Examples:
A member has two children, only one of whom is a trustee of his SMSF. He makes a BDBN because he wants each child to receive an equal share of any death benefit. Readers familiar with the New South Wales Supreme Court case of Katz v Grossman.
A member is married for the second time. She makes a BDBN because she wants her current husband to receive any death benefit. Were any death benefit to be paid to her legal personal representative, it would form part of her estate and her Will could be challenged or contested by the children of her first marriage.
A member has three adult children, one of whom is experiencing marital difficulties for the second time, another of whom is a recovering alcoholic and the other of whom is facing the prospect of bankruptcy. He makes a BDBN because he wants any death benefit to be paid to his legal personal representative who will hold his estate in a series of testamentary trusts.
A BDBN is not a testamentary instrument. It is, therefore, at least arguable that the holder of an enduring power of attorney can make, confirm, amend or revoke a BDBN for the person on whose behalf they hold the enduring power of attorney, particularly if there is an express power in the enduring power of attorney authorising them to do so.
In our opinion, it generally will not, though my answer may differ depending on the precise wording of the trust deed, the pension paperwork and the BDBN in question.
Clearly, inconsistency between pension paperwork and a BDBN should be avoided.
Ineffectual BDBN’s in SMSFs will almost certainly result in Court proceedings. They can highly problematic in situations where there are children of more than one marriage or conflict between children of marriage one and spouse number two. The number of these style of disputes coming before the courts are rapidly increasing.
"John Cockburn is such a down to earth fellow, and extremely knowledgeable in every facet of the law. Grateful to have entrusted the administration of our late parents estate to him. He made the entire process so much easier to endure under difficult circumstances, and always advocated for our best interests. Highly recommended and clearly one of the best lawyers in Brisbane."
"John Cockburn helped in my in a very trying process with my late parents estate. It was a blessing to have his support and guidance on the legal processes and my responsibility as a co-executor. He was my go to person, who always had answers on every matter. I highly recommend seeking John's services for your legal matters as he is a highly qualified professional in the legal field. Thank you John."